Determined Parks Boss Routes Park
Lovers,
Heritage Committee.
Area in background will be broken up by 12 foot wide asphalt roads. |
John
Micelli, Windsor’s newly minted Parks Department leader since Don Sadler
retired last year, will have nothing to do with the heritage or green aspects
of Willistead Park. In a January 8 meeting
with the Heritage Committee, deferred to by City Council, Micelli made his position loud and clear: “Your getting paved paths whether you like it
or not”.
Micelli’s
entire argument focused on standardizing Windsor’s Parks with 10 to 15 foot
wide paved paths for the accommodation of trucks and equipment. Problematic, he says, are the recently
installed garbage receptacles in Willistead that are embedded ten feet
underground to deter bored teenagers from tipping them over. The Parks Department brings in a large truck
with a specialized attachment to pull, empty and re-seat the containers. It was pointed out to the Committee that all
of the receptacles in Willistead are next to existing paths and park entry
points with the exception of one that is ten feet away from the childrens play
set and 35 feet from an existing path. His
other reason is to accommodate Art in the Park which, as one Heritage Committee member pointed out, is The “elephant in the
room”. The proposed circuitous asphalt track and its
tributaries will replace as much as 11 percent of Willistead’s grassy, treed
surface. That is a lot considering that
Willistead measures only 1 kilometer around its perimeter. The path plan mimics the Art in the Park
Vendor map. Micelli also introduced a revised path plan
for Willistead that eliminated one secondary and redundant tributary and
modifies the proposed paths in the North West corner of the park. Area residents were expecting a compromise in
width to 72 inches but that was clearly not what was offered.
It became apparent that Micelli does not want to compromise on his 12
foot wide paths. Area residents and park
users do not want the paths at all. Asked
if the plan revision was posted on the city’s web site Micelli answered “No”. This admission left the Walkerville
delegation to speculate that Micelli is going to try and get his wide paths approved when this issue is brought before City Council later this month. Lastly, Micelli brought up the Accessibility
card which others pointed out was a non starter because the current paths and
entry points are already in compliance.
This is how the east side of the park looked up until this fall.
Same area with gravel bed for new path. |
Delegations
at this Heritage meeting were as follows:
Howard Weeks, founder of the group “Save Willistead Park” and son of
past Mayor Bert Weeks, Gayle Jones, a
lawyer and Windsor’s Diversity and Accessibility Officer and John Micelli ,
Windsor’s Parks Boss, although he seemed to play more of a Steering Committee
role than anything else.
Mr. Weeks
presented passionately around a couple of points: Mainly that stakeholders were never made
aware of changes to the park until heavy equipment came to tear it up. Willistead’s Board of Directors claim otherwise but as of
this writing there are no area residents who have stepped up to verify involvement. Weeks repeatedly called for stakeholder participation
in the process but was rebuffed in each attempt. He
asked if there was any assessment to determine what is actually needed to improve
accessibility. Micelli pointed out that
Gayle Jones was present to address accessibility issues.
Proposed 12 foot asphalt roads represented in yellow. Close to scale |
Ms. Jones
introduced herself as Windsor’s “Diversity and Accessibility Officer”. She clarified that she was unaware of the
Willistead path issue and played no part in it until a few hours before the current Heritage Committee meeting. That clearly answered Howard Weeks’ question
about an “Accessibility Assessment”. She
spoke in certain terms about what is acceptable and what is not. Jones reminded that 54 inch wide surfaces are
quite OK for accessibility in outdoor public areas (Willistead complies) but
that 72 inches would be her preference. She
also stated that she preferred smooth surfaces such as cement or asphalt over
pavers even though pavers do meet the requirement. She said that pavers make an acceptable compromise
if they are installed on the edges of a paved surface because they can be used
as warning or cuing surfaces for white cane technique.
After all
delegations completed their presentations it was time for the Heritage
Committee to chime in and vote on the subject.
There were some who questioned the added paths but they were coaxed by
Micelli to keep moving forward. The group
voted in favour of the new paths per Rev. 2 by a narrow margin. They voted that the paths should be no more
than 72 inch wide and that they should be paved with asphalt. This recommendation will be presented to City
Council later this month.
Area residents take control and save Art in the Park during City Strike. This exact area already has a twelve foot path running through it. |
The Parks
Department has budgeted $400,000.00 for these proposed changes. Also in attendance at the meeting were
Councillors Allan Halberstadt who is also a member of the Willistead Board of
Directors and Fulvio Valentinis who is a member of the Heritage Committee.
Art in the Park on real grass. |
Old brick path being replaced with 12 foot wide road bed. |
***All photos courtesy of Willistead Facebook Photo Page.
See links below for some great shots of Willistead Park.
Most taken by area residents.
Click on images to enlarge.
Click on images to enlarge.
For more information about paved pathways for
“Art in the Park” follow these links:
5 comments:
Good story, thanks MOM.
Here is my address to the heritage committee meeting:
Contained in the report to the Heritage Committee, with subject being Willistead Manor, Heritage alteration: install paths in the park, under the heading Considerations, sub-heading maintenance vehicles, is and I quote,"Should machines for routine maintenance be to city standard or different," is found this information, "A 2014 model SUV, (Escalade) could fit on about 1.93 metres (6' 4") with no clearance, but would need additional width for steering." End quote. Other considerations listed are accessibility and yes, "Art in the Park"
My question here is, what does any of this have to do with the heritage aspect of Willistead Park. An even more important question is how does putting 10.5 acres of hardscape asphalt into the park, improve its heritage value.
Its easy to list several reason why the roadway plan, from a heritage viewpoint is not acceptable. The proposed roadways would offend the intent of the Heritage designating by-law. In particular, one of the features designating the park as a Heritage site is its "limited hardscape". If the roadways are built that particular feature will no longer exist and thus could jeopardize the designation. In this regard, the proposed roadways offend against the intent of the by-law. The by-law lists the features upon which the park has been designated as a Heritage Park. Eliminating one of these features contravenes the designation
Howard Weeks, organizer, Save Willistead Park
How wide is the paved road on the Riverfront? If Willistead must be 12 feet wide, so too must the riverfront.
The exact "paved" width that Micelli is standardizing is 10 feet (for all Windsor Parks). With that comes 24" of gravel shoulder. Especially in Willistead park where these roads are higher than surrounding grass. He says that Jackson Park (56 acres) and the riverfront(several km long) are at ten feet. So too at other parks in the city. This may work for those parks because of their vast size plus they are point A to point B trails. Willistead exists inside a 1 km envelope. Remember, it is supposed to be the back and front yard to the Manor. That is what it's historical designation says.
I would say that if the Willistead paths must be 10-12' (in order to be considered "accessible") then so should every single sidewalk in the city, including those on residential streets, and every single block currently without sidewalks should be retrofitted with 10-12' sidewalks.
Post a Comment